EV Series

Charging Ahead or Slowing Progress? The Patent Battles Shaping EV Infrastructure

In collaboration with PatentRenewal.com, a company specializing in automated and transparent IP renewals, we explored the evolving EV charging networks and infrastructure. PatentRenewal.com simplifies the IP renewal process for companies worldwide, offering cost-effective solutions that ensure seamless IP management

This blog brings together our shared expertise to examine the challenges and opportunities of EV charging networks and their impact on the IP landscape.

Power Struggles in EV Charging Innovation

The global transition to electric vehicles (EVs) has revolutionized the automotive industry while creating the demand for efficient and accessible charging infrastructure. As companies innovate to meet this need, intellectual property has become a major battleground, influencing the industry’s trajectory. Patent disputes in the EV charging sector raise critical questions. Do they protect investment and drive innovation, or do they stifle competition and slow down market growth? This article explores key legal battles, major industry players, and the broader implications of these conflicts on the future of EV charging networks.

The growing market for EV charging and IP competition

With EV adoption skyrocketing, the demand for accessible and efficient charging infrastructure is at an all-time high. In the United States alone, the number of charging ports more than doubled between 2018 and 2022, reflecting the increasing adoption of electric vehicles. 

Global investment in electrified transport, which includes passenger EVs, commercial electric vehicles, public charging infrastructure, and fuel cell vehicles, reached $757 billion in 2024. Moreover, investments in power grids, crucial for supporting EV charging infrastructure, totaled $390 billion, highlighting the growing emphasis on electricity distribution and grid modernization.

Additionally, the clean energy supply chain saw an investment of $140 billion in 2024, with a significant portion allocated to battery cell factories, highlighting the capital-intensive nature of EV infrastructure development. 

From an IP perspective, companies such as Tesla, ChargePoint, WiTricity, ABB, and Shell Recharge are leading the “charge”, each filing patents to protect their advancements in ultra-fast charging, wireless charging, and smart energy management. 

High-profile EV charging patent wars

As the EV charging market expands, companies are increasingly turning to patents to secure their competitive edge. While some view IP enforcement as a necessary tool to protect innovation, others argue that aggressive litigation stifles competition. The following cases highlight key legal battles that have shaped the industry landscape.

ChargePoint vs. SemaConnect

ChargePoint filed a lawsuit against SemaConnect, alleging infringement of patents related to networked EV charging stations. The U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland dismissed the case, ruling that the asserted patents were directed to abstract ideas and were therefore ineligible for patent protection under 35 U.S.C. § 101. This decision was later upheld by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Tesla's patent approach

Tesla has long championed an open-patent approach, announcing in 2014 that it would allow others to use its patents in good faith to accelerate EV adoption. However, in August 2024, Tesla filed a lawsuit against EVject, a startup producing the Escape Connector, a MagSafe-style EV charging adapter. Tesla argued that the device posed safety risks due to overheating during high-current simulations, though independent evaluations of these claims remain unclear. In response, EVject voluntarily recalled the affected models and introduced a safer version, leading Tesla to drop its lawsuit in October 2024. This case highlights the evolving balance between open innovation and strategic patent enforcement.

WiTricity’s legal battles

WiTricity, a pioneer in wireless EV charging, has historically been active in enforcing its patents. In 2020, the company, alongside MIT, sued Momentum Dynamics for allegedly infringing patents related to wireless power transfer. While the lawsuit underscores the importance of patent protection in emerging technologies, details about its resolution remain scarce. As wireless charging gains traction, similar disputes are likely to emerge.

Industry strategies: collaboration vs. litigation

 As various legal battles unfold, a broader pattern emerges: some companies use the IP system to build industry-wide partnerships, while others see litigation as a necessary tool to defend their market position. 

  • Tesla initially embraced an open-patent pledge aimed to foster industry-wide innovation, yet recent lawsuits suggest a shift to more strategic enforcement.
  • ChargePoint takes a more aggressive stance, actively litigating its patents, illustrating the challenges startups may face when entering the market.
  • Traditional automakers like Ford and GM have largely steered clear of litigation, opting instead for strategic licensing and partnerships to expand their role in the EV IP ecosystem.

For IP holders, navigating the competitive EV charging landscape means balancing protection with accessibility - too much enforcement can stifle growth, while too little can undermine investment. The question remains. Will the industry lean toward more cooperative licensing models or will legal battles continue to shape the market? 

Regardless of where the industry lands, one thing remains clear: companies in this space must take a strategic approach to IP management to stay competitive in this evolving space. Maintaining a strong patent portfolio through timely renewals is essential to protecting valuable innovations. At the same time, intelligently searching and monitoring patent activity can provide critical insights into competitive landscapes and emerging threats.

Regulatory and legal trends in EV charging IP

Beyond company strategies, the broader legal and regulatory landscape also plays an important role in shaping the future of EV charging technology. Several key trends are influencing how business protect and enforce their innovations:

  • Standard-Essential Patents (SEPs): Patent holders must license these patents on Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms. Recent U.S. and EU rulings emphasize stricter enforcement of FRAND obligations.
  • Software patentability: Courts increasingly challenge software-based patents, particularly those covering abstract concepts like network management in charging stations.
  • China’s patent expansion: China leads in EV patent filings, aggressively securing IP rights while promoting rapid industry expansion. In addition, China led global investment in the low-carbon transition with $818 billion in 2024, surpassing the combined investments of the US, EU, and UK.
  • U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA): The IRA’s funding for EV infrastructure could reshape patent strategies by incentivizing new technologies and open-source solutions. However, U.S. investment in the energy transition remained stagnant at $338 billion in 2024, highlighting challenges in maintaining growth amid policy shifts and economic conditions.

What’s next for the future of IP in EV?

As the legal and regulatory environment continues to evolve, so too does the technology itself. Looking ahead, several key developments are bringing new IP challenges that will influence the patent landscape in EV charging:

  • AI-driven charging: Patents related to AI-powered energy management could spark new legal disputes.
  • Blockchain for patent tracking: Companies may use blockchain to verify patent ownership and licensing in real-time.
  • Bidirectional charging & ultra-fast charging: These technologies are expected to be the next patent battlegrounds as companies race to establish dominance.

The interplay between innovation, competition, and legal battles in the EV charging industry presents both challenges and opportunities. Moving forward, industry leaders, policymakers, and startups must determine whether cooperation or continued courtroom conflicts will define the future. Companies investing in EV charging technologies should proactively track IP risks and opportunities to navigate this evolving landscape effectively.

More Blog Posts Coming Soon!

Sign up to receive alerts when we publish more blog posts about how NLPatent has brought success to the field of IP and AI.

Thank you!
Your submission has been received!
Oops!
Something went wrong while submitting the form.
Ready to get started?
Thank you!
Your submission has been received!
Oops!
Something went wrong while submitting the form.